Overview
Cursor Composer 2.5, released May 18, 2026, is the next iteration of Cursor's proprietary coding model. It is built on the same Moonshot Kimi K2.5 open-source checkpoint that Composer 2 uses, with Composer 2.5-specific training improvements rather than a new base model. Cursor describes the upgrade as a "substantial improvement in intelligence and behavior" with the headline change being calmer collaboration on long-running tasks.
Pricing matches Composer 2 on the Standard variant at $0.50 per 1M input tokens and $2.50 per 1M output tokens. The Fast variant — which has been the default model surface inside Cursor since Composer 2 — is repriced to $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output. All users get double usage credits in the first week of launch.
What's New
Same Kimi K2.5 base, new training stack
Composer 2.5 keeps the open-source base that Cursor first adopted for Composer 2 (Moonshot's Kimi K2.5 checkpoint) and rebuilds the training stack on top of it. The launch post highlights training improvements such as sharded Muon optimization and dual-mesh HSDP, with an optimizer step time of about 0.2 seconds on the 1T-parameter model. This is an iteration on Composer 2's foundation, not a new architectural shift.
25× more synthetic training tasks
The largest training-side change is volume: Composer 2.5 was trained on roughly 25× more synthetic coding tasks than Composer 2. Cursor uses these synthetic tasks to expand coverage of complex RL environments and to support new learning methods that Composer 2's smaller synthetic dataset could not. Cursor attributes much of the "better at sustained work on long-running tasks" claim to this expansion.
Targeted textual feedback in RL
Beyond more synthetic tasks, Composer 2.5 introduces targeted textual feedback during reinforcement learning — the model receives written critique on its actions rather than only numeric reward signals. Cursor presents this as a key driver behind the improved instruction-following and effort calibration that 2.5 advertises.
Calmer, better-calibrated agent behavior
Cursor explicitly frames 2.5 as "more pleasant to collaborate with." Post-training prioritized stronger instruction-following on complex, multi-step prompts and improved effort calibration, so the model spends more reasoning on harder tasks and less on simple ones rather than running at full effort by default. The launch post does not advertise a speed regression on simple tasks.
Separate SpaceXAI larger-model partnership (forward-looking)
Cursor's launch post also notes a separate effort: together with SpaceXAI, Cursor is training a significantly larger model from scratch using 10× more total compute. The launch post presents this as forward-looking context about Cursor's future model training, not as a confirmed Composer 2.5 training input. Treat the 10× number as a roadmap signal, not a Composer 2.5 specification.
Pricing and default surface
Standard pricing is held flat at $0.50/M input and $2.50/M output. The Fast variant is repriced to $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output. Fast remains the default model surface inside Cursor, the same as in Composer 2. The double-credit week-one promotion applies to both variants.
Migration Guide
From Composer 2
The launch post does not mention an API rename or breaking change to surface; Cursor swaps the underlying model when you opt into 2.5. Practical advice:
- Re-run any internal evals that previously baselined Composer 2 — Cursor calls out substantial behavioral changes (instruction-following, effort calibration, textual-feedback-trained), not just raw capability gains, so behavior on your task set may shift in ways that aren't benchmark-visible.
- Fast remains the default, but its token price is higher than Composer 2 Fast; review model selection and usage settings before migrating cost-sensitive workflows.
- Use the double-credit week-one window for migration testing rather than incremental adoption.
From Composer 1.5
The 1.5 → 2 → 2.5 path is large. Composer 2 was already a major step up on CursorBench (44.2 → 61.3) and Terminal-Bench 2.0 (47.9 → 61.7). Composer 2.5 is described qualitatively as a further "substantial" jump on top of that, and Cursor's launch post embeds a benchmark comparison table image — see the media attached to this page for the official chart.
API and channel access
Composer 2.5 is generally available in Cursor today. Cursor's launch post does not announce a separate third-party API for Composer 2.5 at launch — programmatic use still happens through the Cursor editor or its existing integrations.
Pricing & Plans
Composer 2.5 is billed per token via the Cursor IDE. Cursor's underlying subscription tiers (Hobby / Pro / Business) determine monthly credit allocations.
| Variant | Input | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | $0.50 / 1M | $2.50 / 1M | Same input price as Composer 2 |
| Fast | $3.00 / 1M | $15.00 / 1M | Default model surface inside Cursor (since Composer 2) |
| Week-one bonus | — | — | Double usage credits for all users in launch week |
Cursor Pro starts at $20/month and includes monthly Composer credits; heavy usage is billed per the table above. Composer 2.5 changes Fast variant pricing versus Composer 2, so verify current Cursor model pricing on the official pricing page before setting production budgets.
Best For
- Cursor teams that hit Composer 2's ceiling on multi-hour, multi-file refactoring or long agentic loops.
- Engineering orgs comparing IDE-native coding agents against external API-based agents like Claude Code or Codex CLI.
- Developers who prefer the Fast variant's response speed and can absorb the higher per-token cost.
- Teams that already standardized on Cursor Pro / Business and want the latest Composer model without changing tooling.
- Solo developers running long-form agentic experiments who can take advantage of the week-one double-credit window.
FAQ
What is Cursor Composer 2.5?
Cursor Composer 2.5 is the next iteration of Cursor's proprietary coding model, launched May 18, 2026. It is built on the same Moonshot Kimi K2.5 open-source checkpoint that Composer 2 uses, with Composer 2.5-specific training improvements rather than a new base model. Cursor positions it as a "substantial improvement in intelligence and behavior" over Composer 2.
How does Composer 2.5 differ from Composer 2?
Three main changes: (1) it keeps the same Moonshot Kimi K2.5 open checkpoint as Composer 2 but adds new training-stack improvements (sharded Muon, dual-mesh HSDP), (2) it uses roughly 25× more synthetic training tasks plus targeted textual feedback during reinforcement learning, and (3) Fast variant pricing rises to $3.00/M input while Standard pricing stays flat at $0.50/M input. Fast remains the default model surface, same as Composer 2.
Are there Composer 2.5 benchmark numbers vs Composer 2?
Cursor's launch post includes a benchmark comparison table image (visible in the media attached to this page) covering Terminal-Bench, SWE-Bench Multilingual, and CursorBench. The post's body text does not reproduce the specific numbers — visit the official blog or the embedded chart for the authoritative figures.
How much does Cursor Composer 2.5 cost?
Standard: $0.50 per 1M input tokens and $2.50 per 1M output tokens. Fast (the default in Cursor since Composer 2): $3.00 per 1M input and $15.00 per 1M output. All users get double usage credits during launch week. Cursor Pro starts at $20/month and bundles monthly Composer credits.
Is there a separate API for Composer 2.5?
Cursor has not announced a standalone third-party Composer 2.5 API in the launch materials. Describe access as available through the Cursor IDE and its existing integrations rather than as a published API.
Should I migrate from Composer 2 today?
If you hit Composer 2's limits on long-running tasks or multi-step refactors, the launch-week double-credit window is a low-cost time to test. If your workflow is stable on Composer 2 and depends on prompt patterns tuned for it, re-run internal evals before switching — Cursor flags behavioral changes that may not appear on benchmarks.
What is the relationship with Moonshot and SpaceXAI?
Cursor uses Moonshot's Kimi K2.5 open-source checkpoint as the base for Composer 2.5 (same base as Composer 2). Separately, Cursor is training a significantly larger model from scratch with SpaceXAI using roughly 10× more total compute — Cursor presents this as forward-looking context for future Cursor models, not as a Composer 2.5 training input.




