MiniMax icon

MiniMax M2.7

M2.7

Build and orchestrate agent teams natively with role boundaries, adversarial reasoning, and identity-stable multi-agent collaboration built into the model core Run at ~60 TPS (standard) or ~100 TPS (highspeed variant) on a 204,800-token context window, matching Opus-class SWE-Pro performance at $0.30/M input tokens Enable recursive self-improvement: M2.7 updates its own memory, builds harness skills autonomously, and iterates on RL experiments — the first MiniMax model in its own training loop

Reviewed by ToolWorthy Editors·updated 3 months ago

Pricing:Free + from $0.30/per M input tokens
Newer version available·View latest
Jump to section

Featured alternatives

Coasty icon

Coasty

MakersClaw icon

MakersClaw

BrowserAct icon

BrowserAct

Timbal AI icon

Timbal AI

Atomic Mail Agentic icon

Atomic Mail Agentic

Rasa icon

Rasa

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Recursive self-improvement is a notable architectural differentiator for MiniMax, though broader market-wide uniqueness should be validated independently
  • SWE-Pro and VIBE-Pro scores position M2.7 near Opus 4.6 in MiniMax's cited comparisons on complex software engineering tasks
  • Two throughput tiers (60 TPS / 100 TPS) let teams match cost to latency requirements without switching models
  • 204,800-token context window handles large codebases and extended multi-turn agent sessions
  • $0.30/M input pricing is significantly lower than closed-source frontier alternatives at similar benchmark levels

Cons

  • Recursive self-improvement capability is currently documented through internal MiniMax testing — independent third-party validation is limited
  • M2.7 open-weight release status is not yet confirmed; earlier M-series models (M1–M2.5) have open Hugging Face releases, but check the MiniMaxAI organization for M2.7 availability
  • M2.7-highspeed pricing at $0.60/M input and $2.40/M output matches the current listed price of MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, while both are positioned around ~100 TPS
  • The agent platform UI and documentation are still evolving; this is an editorial observation based on the platform's recent launch rather than a release-backed product claim

Overview

The March 18, 2026 MiniMax release introduces M2.7 — the first model in the M-series to participate in its own evolutionary development cycle. Where M2.5 focused on advancing coding benchmarks and office task automation, M2.7 shifts the architecture toward autonomous self-improvement: the model can update its own memory, build dozens of complex skills in its agent harness, and run reinforcement learning experiments without human intervention.

M2.7 supports a 204,800-token context window and runs at approximately 60 TPS in standard configuration, with a MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed variant reaching approximately 100 TPS at higher throughput cost. On software engineering benchmarks, M2.7 reaches 56.22% on SWE-Pro — near Claude Opus 4.6 parity — while the AI agent platform at agent.minimax.io gives non-technical users direct access without API setup.

What's New

Recursive Self-Improvement

M2.7 is the first MiniMax model designed to participate in its own training loop. It can update its own memory store, construct new harness skills (each up to 2,000+ tokens), and manage reinforcement learning experiments autonomously. In internal MiniMax testing, 100+ self-improvement iterations produced a 30% performance improvement — a capability that has no direct precedent in the M-series history.

MiniMax reports a 97% skill adherence rate while working with over 40 complex skills, each exceeding 2,000 tokens, meaning the self-built skills stay stable and consistent rather than drifting during extended agentic sessions.

Native Multi-Agent Collaboration

M2.7 introduces built-in support for agent teams with defined role boundaries, adversarial reasoning between agents, and behavioral differentiation. Agents in a M2.7-powered team can take on distinct personas, challenge each other's reasoning, and coordinate toward complex goals — a significant step beyond M2.5's single-agent optimization focus.

This native multi-agent design is reflected in benchmarks: M2.7 scores 62.7% on MM Claw (agent interaction benchmark), approaching Claude Sonnet 4.6 on that dimension.

Benchmark Performance

Benchmark M2.7 Notes
SWE-Pro 56.22% Near Claude Opus 4.6 level
VIBE-Pro 55.6% Full project delivery
Terminal Bench 2 57.0% Complex systems understanding
MM Claw 62.7% Agent interaction, near Sonnet 4.6
GDPval-AA 1495 ELO Highest among open-source models
MLE Bench Lite 66.6% avg ML competition tasks

Throughput Variants

M2.7 ships in two configurations:

  • MiniMax-M2.7: ~60 TPS, 204,800-token context window, $0.30/M input / $1.20/M output
  • MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed: ~100 TPS, same context and performance, $0.60/M input / $2.40/M output

Prompt caching is available separately at $0.06/M read tokens and $0.375/M write tokens, applicable to both variants.

Professional Office Integration

M2.7 maintains strong office-task performance with significantly improved Excel, PowerPoint, and Word editing for multi-round revisions; separately, MiniMax reports a 97% skill adherence rate across 40 complex skills exceeding 2,000 tokens. It handles finance-specific tasks including revenue modeling, research report generation, and assumption design from company financials.

Availability & Access

M2.7 is available on MiniMax Agent (agent.minimax.io) for interactive use and on the MiniMax API platform (platform.minimax.io) for programmatic access. Both the standard M2.7 and M2.7-highspeed variants are accessible via the API. A Coding Plan subscription is available at platform.minimax.io/subscribe/coding-plan for development teams needing high daily usage.

Access Path Details
MiniMax Agent Free tier with credits; no API key required
API Pay-As-You-Go $0.30/M input, $1.20/M output (M2.7 standard)
API Highspeed $0.60/M input, $2.40/M output (M2.7-highspeed)
Prompt Caching $0.06/M read, $0.375/M write (both variants)

Pricing & Plans

MiniMax M2.7 uses pay-as-you-go API pricing with no required subscription tier for standard access.

Plan Model Input Output
API Standard M2.7 $0.30/M $1.20/M
API Highspeed M2.7-highspeed $0.60/M $2.40/M
Prompt Cache Read Both $0.06/M
Prompt Cache Write Both $0.375/M

For teams needing higher usage volumes, the Coding Plan subscription at platform.minimax.io/subscribe/coding-plan provides a structured alternative to pure pay-as-you-go. Enterprise pricing and SLA terms are available by contacting MiniMax directly.

Best For

  • Development teams building AI agent pipelines that require multi-agent orchestration and autonomous task execution at low API cost
  • ML researchers using GLM-5 or similar open-weight models who want a frontier alternative with self-improvement capabilities
  • Software engineering teams comparing M2.7 against GPT-5.3-Codex or Claude Opus 4.6 on SWE-bench class tasks
  • Finance, research, and office automation workflows requiring multi-round document generation with high skill adherence
  • Organizations evaluating open-source-friendly vendors given MiniMax's track record of releasing weights for prior M-series versions

FAQ

How is M2.7 different from M2.5?

M2.5 (February 2026) optimized for coding SOTA benchmarks (80.2% SWE-Bench Verified) and faster agentic task completion. M2.7 shifts the design toward autonomous agent teams and recursive self-improvement — M2.7's 56.22% SWE-Pro result and M2.5's 80.2% SWE-Bench Verified result come from different benchmarks and should not be compared directly, but M2.7 adds native multi-agent collaboration, a 30% self-improvement gain through recursive iterations, and significantly more complex skill management capabilities.

What does "recursive self-improvement" mean in practice?

M2.7 can build its own harness skills (reusable instruction sets up to 2,000+ tokens each), update its own memory store based on task outcomes, and run RL experiments to optimize its own performance. In MiniMax's internal trials, 100+ automated iterations produced a 30% performance improvement. This makes M2.7 useful for tasks where you want the model to improve its approach over time rather than starting fresh each session.

Is M2.7 available as open-source weights?

MiniMax has released open weights for M1, M2, M2.1, and M2.5 on Hugging Face. Check the MiniMaxAI organization on Hugging Face for the current status of M2.7 weight availability — this is not yet confirmed as publicly released as of March 2026.

How does M2.7 pricing compare to Claude Opus 4.6?

MiniMax-M2.7 is priced at $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output. Claude Opus 4.6 is priced at approximately $5.00/M input. MiniMax says M2.7's 56.22% SWE-Pro score nearly approaches Opus's best level, but exact cross-model parity should be framed cautiously given the comparison relies on MiniMax-cited evaluations. For teams where API cost is a primary constraint and SWE-class performance is the target, M2.7 offers a substantially lower cost at comparable benchmark performance.

Can I use M2.7 without API access?

Yes. MiniMax Agent at agent.minimax.io provides free-tier access to M2.7 for interactive use — no API key or programming required. This makes it accessible for product designers, researchers, and users who want to test M2.7's agentic capabilities without setting up API billing.

Version History

M3

Released on June 1, 2026

View Update
+What's new
3 updates
  • Surpass GPT-5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro on SWE-Bench Pro at 59.0% while approaching Opus 4.7, with autonomous 12-hour ICLR 2025 paper reproduction across 18 commits
  • Process 1M-token contexts via MiniMax Sparse Attention (MSA), cutting per-token compute to 1/20 of M2.7 with 9x prefill and 15x decode throughput gains
  • Combine frontier coding, 1M context, and native multimodality in a single open-weight model — weights release on Hugging Face within 10 days alongside the technical report

M2.7

Current Version

Released on March 18, 2026

+What's new
3 updates
  • Build and orchestrate agent teams natively with role boundaries, adversarial reasoning, and identity-stable multi-agent collaboration built into the model core
  • Run at ~60 TPS (standard) or ~100 TPS (highspeed variant) on a 204,800-token context window, matching Opus-class SWE-Pro performance at $0.30/M input tokens
  • Enable recursive self-improvement: M2.7 updates its own memory, builds harness skills autonomously, and iterates on RL experiments — the first MiniMax model in its own training loop

M2.5

Released on February 12, 2026

+What's new
3 updates
  • Achieve SOTA coding performance with 80.2% on SWE-Bench Verified and 51.3% on Multi-SWE-Bench, completing tasks 37% faster than M2.1 with fewer agentic rounds
  • Automate complex office workflows across Excel, PowerPoint, and Word with a 59% average win rate on GDPval-MM professional productivity evaluations
  • Access two throughput tiers — M2.5 and M2.5-highspeed — with low-cost M-series pricing and faster highspeed inference for production coding, search, and agent workflows

M2.1

Released on December 23, 2025

+What's new
3 updates
  • Expand multi-language programming coverage to Rust, Java, Golang, C++, Kotlin, Objective-C, TypeScript, and JavaScript for real-world development workflows
  • Handle complex professional office tasks with improved Excel, PowerPoint, and Word scenario coverage built on M2's agentic foundation
  • Deploy via open-source weights on Hugging Face with vLLM and SGLang support, extending M2's self-hosting path to the enhanced M2.1 capability set

M2

Released on October 27, 2025

+What's new
3 updates
  • Execute end-to-end software development workflows — from code generation to debugging to deployment — with a 230B MoE architecture activating 10B parameters per token at ~100 TPS
  • Automate multi-step agentic tasks with complex tool-calling at 8% of Claude 4.5 Sonnet's API cost and nearly double the inference speed, enabling cost-effective production pipelines
  • Self-host with open-source weights on Hugging Face (vLLM and SGLang compatible) with a free trial period available through November 7, 2025

M1

Released on June 16, 2025

+What's new
3 updates
  • Process up to 1 million tokens in a single context window using a hybrid-attention architecture with Lightning Attention, matching Google Gemini 2.5 Pro's context length as an open-weight model
  • Reason over long documents and multi-step problems with a 1M-token context window, 80K-token reasoning output, and roughly 30% of DeepSeek R1's compute for 80K-token deep reasoning
  • Train cost-efficiently using the CISPO reinforcement learning algorithm at a total RL cost of $534,700, demonstrating a scalable path to large-scale reasoning model development

Top alternatives

Related categories

From the blog

View all →

Track MiniMax in ToolWorthy Weekly

Important tool updates, better alternatives, and selected AI signals in one weekly brief.

Weekly only. Unsubscribe anytime.